jwatte
DeleD PRO user
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 513
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:59 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Paul-Jan wrote: |
| jwatte: Your 'namespace' suggestion for plugin properties does require that plugins need to be explicitly aware of each other's names before they can share settings. How do you propose to handle this? Or would shared properties not be prefixed by a name at all? |
If you want to use the parameter, then you supposedly have some kind of shared specification for what that parameter does (so that you and the other plug-in can co-exist peacefully). That specification is what specifies what the "plugin name" should be for those parameters. Call it "protocol name" instead if it suits you better. Protocols have parameters that have values. If I want to use a shared protocol, I use the name of that shared protocol, as documented in the protocol docs (published by the first implementer on the web, or whatever). |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
