DeleD Community Edition

Jeroen

Check out the gallery to find an image of Elementrix' latest project: a village in the forest. Nice atmosphere and lightmapping, I'd say! Smile

elementrix · Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject:

i don't know if it's my computer but i only see half of the image?

Vijchti · Member Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 250

Same here.
_________________

"Psst, Here's a secret...Your last mortal thought will be,
'Why did I take so many days - just like today - for granted?'"

Nocturn · DeleD PRO user Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 635

Firefox Bug. It isn't W3C Valid. Works only with IE 5.x+ and/or Opera.

trucker2000 · Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:49 pm Post subject:

I'm using IE6 and only see the top half of the pic.
_________________
Some day I will grow up and be a real modeler.
"Never give up! Never surrender!!"
Sys specs:
asus
8 gigs ram
Invidia gtx560 video card
Windows 8 (worst op sys Ever)

Mr.Fletcher · Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject:

IE7 only shows the one half, too.
_________________
Behold! The DeleD Wiki! Please help us expanding it Smile

DeleD on IRC

granada · Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject:

Same with slimbrowser.

Dave
_________________
AMD Phenom(tm)IIx6 1090t Processor 3.20 GHS
8.00 GB memory
Windows 7 64 bit
Nvida Geforce GTX 580

Nocturn · DeleD PRO user Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 635

Hm, strange. The Site Structure is also very Strange. See Image here

Paul-Jan · Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject:

The reason why everyone only sees half an image is probably because the file upload didn't succeed 100%, to me it looks like a corrupt file. The problem is I don't have the original, and Jeroen is out of town for the weekend. Will fix it a.s.a.p. when he comes back.

The popup-style viewing will be replaced one of these days (when I find the time) with something all popular browsers agree with.

The reason for the weird html structure is the fact that we jammed the gallery-code (mine) into the Delgine site framework (Jeroen's) in... let's say a quite unorthodox way. Or you could just call it a quick and dirty hack. We didn't want to spend more time than necessary on it, but if it gets in the way too much we'll have to revisit it. Don't care too much about w3c compliance in this particular case, but a site that's not working properly is not acceptable.

Nocturn: About that screenshot: I see the double body declarations (in the 2 .css files), but although not very neat that's not breaking the specs iirc(later declarations override). Anything else in that screenshot I should take a look at (it's friday night, my wits are not exactly sharp at the moment)? Very Happy